Cash ISAs, which enable individuals to save up to £20,000 tax-free annually, remain popular among UK savers. However, recent speculation suggests that the Government could be considering moves to reduce or scrap cash ISA allowances, prompting concern from both savers and financial commentators. According to a recent survey by the Building Societies Association (BSA), only 8% of respondents supported cutting the current tax-free allowance, whereas 73% opposed changes that could compromise this well-established savings vehicle.
Cash ISAs are of particular interest to those seeking certainty in their investments. The same BSA survey found that 90% of cash ISA savers place a high value on safeguarding their initial deposits, highlighting a widespread reluctance to risk capital loss. Indeed, cash accounts are among the few savings products that guarantee the return of deposited funds, offering reassurance to individuals with limited incomes or minimal appetite for risk.
Accounting data from HMRC underscores the reliance that many low- to mid-income earners place on cash ISAs. Almost half (47%) of such accounts are held by individuals earning less than £20,000 a year. For many, the average balance of just under £13,400 represents a financial lifeline, preserving funds in a safe and accessible environment. By contrast, stocks and shares ISAs attract a smaller group of savers – around 20% overall – mainly those on higher incomes who may be willing to accept the fluctuations inherent in financial markets.
While the Government has not confirmed any final decisions, some observers believe the Chancellor may introduce revisions in the upcoming Spring Statement on 26 March. One option under discussion is reportedly lowering the annual tax-free allowance for cash ISAs to £4,000. Such a measure would place cash ISA limits in line with lifetime ISAs, a product designed to encourage saving for first homes or retirement.
The Treasury is thought to be weighing up several factors, including the estimated £7 billion annual cost in tax relief for all ISA products combined. However, any reduction in the cash ISA allowance might draw criticism from those who argue that lower earners could be disproportionately affected. Furthermore, there are concerns that restricting cash ISAs could undermine broader Government objectives, such as increasing home ownership by ensuring mortgage funds remain readily available to prospective buyers.
Possible changes to cash ISAs
The suggestion of lowering or removing tax-free cash ISA allowances is not entirely new. However, the debate has intensified in light of broader cost-of-living challenges and the Government’s search for potential revenue streams. Critics fear that any significant alteration to cash ISA rules might deter individuals from building a financial safety net, a goal that successive Governments have consistently encouraged.
Impact on savers
Reducing the allowance could significantly impact savers who prefer low-risk options. While some policymakers advocate for greater investment in stocks and shares, many savers are reluctant to expose their funds to market volatility. The BSA survey results reinforce the perception that many people want to preserve what they have rather than aim for higher returns with an accompanying risk of losses.
Observers also note that cash ISAs are a crucial funding source for banks, building societies, and credit unions. Deposits held in these accounts can be lent out as mortgages, supporting homeownership goals and the wider housing market. Thus, any move that might shrink the cash ISA market could have implications beyond individual savers, potentially influencing mortgage availability and cost.
Robin Fieth, chief executive at the Building Societies Association, said:
“Cash ISAs are an important source of funding for building societies, credit unions, banks and other providers which use the deposits to fund their lending to individuals, families and businesses.
“With the Government committed to increasing home ownership and building 1.5m new homes, it’s baffling why the Chancellor would want to risk making mortgage availability more difficult and more expensive for first time buyers and home movers.
“A cut to the allowance would be the first time it’s been reduced since ISAs were introduced in 1999 by the then Labour Government.
“We will continue to press the Chancellor to listen to all sides of the cash ISA argument, not just to the loud voices of a group of self-interested big businesses. We would welcome the same opportunity to meet with her and discuss the important reasons why she should not reduce the amount hard-working people can save in cash ISAs.”
Talk to us about your investments.